Feb 03 2011

Kynodontas (Dogtooth) DVD

Despite the surreal setting and the characters that are barely recognizable as human, Giorgos Lanthimos‘s Dogtooth does get under your skin. Although the film may at times seem “as much an exercise in perversity as an examination of it” (A.O. Scott, The New York Times), Mr. Lanthimos manages to show very vividly that the human impulse to be free and to explore cannot be contained. Even though the outcome of that impulse will always remain uncertain. In that sense, this movie could serve as an allegory for many a crumbling repressive regime.

Dogtooth demands the viewer’s attention immediately because it starts by introducing us to a linguistic puzzle that is all the more confusing if you have to depend on subtitles: two girls and a boy in their late teens (who will remain nameless throughout the movie) sit in their underwear in a bathroom and listen to a tape that explains new words to them. But the meaning that is given by the voice of the recording is obviously wrong (“a carbine is a beautiful white bird”). One of the girls proposes a new game of endurance that involves holding your finger in a stream of boiling hot water. In this scene as in others, “the film’s purposeful weirdness is conveyed with an unaffected simplicity” (Mark Olsen, Los Angeles Times). There is no nondiegetic music, the acting is robotic and shots are often awkwardly framed. Mr. Lanthimos seems to abide by his own Dogme rules.

As the movie progresses, it becomes clear that we are witnessing a decidedly unhealthy arrangement. The three kids are siblings being held captive by their parents in an artificial world created to keep them safe from impure influences. They never go outside the confines of their idyllic villa, convinced that unspeakable danger lurks there. Only their father ventures outside to his job at a factory and from time to time he brings back Christina, one of the security guards at the plant, to make sure his son can give free rein to his sexual urges (in scenes that are explicit but entirely without passion, in keeping with the tone of the movie).

About halfway through the film the point about the bizarre goings-on inside this compound has been made and you begin to wonder where the story is headed. It is then that Lanthimos (who co-wrote the scipt with Efthymis Filippou) introduces a brilliant narrative device that sets a climax in motion. Without giving away too much, I will say that it involves a delicious use of Hollywood classics. Lines from Rocky and Jaws may be somewhat hard to recognize or enjoy when in Greek with subtitles. But Lanthimos draws everyone in for the film’s gut-wrenching finale by quoting a choreography from Flashdance. It’s only when the credits roll that you realize you have grown fond of these cardboard kids, no doubt because of what they represent.

Jan 28 2011

Sundance hits and Oscar noms

Needless to say, the Sundance Film Festival is dominating the movie news this week with hits, misses and unexpected stars. A surprisingly large number of films have already been picked up by distributors, so we’ll call that a good sign for the industry. The films being picked up go from the not-so-well-received (I Melt With You had audience walkouts and bad reviews, but big names) and the not-quite-sure (is Margin Call too talky or absorbing?) to the standing ovations (Another Earth, despite its cheap look) and outright winners (the haunting Martha Marcy May Marlene).

Elizabeth Olsen in Martha Marcy May Marlene

Sundance also has its first breakout star in Elizabeth Olsen, the younger sister of the Olsen twins who had been quietly pursuing an acting career and suddenly arrives at Sundance with two movies: the aforementioned Martha Marcy May Marlene and Silent House (which garnered buzz because the directors claim it consists of one continuous shot). This girl is definitely going places. On the other end of the spectrum there was Kevin Smith, who wasted a lot of people’s time by organizing a fake auction for the distribution rights of his movie Red State. The guy seems intent on alienating any supporters he may have left in the industry or among those covering movies.

The other big news this week was the announcement of the Academy Award nominees. The list contained no significant upsets for those paying attention to the major guild nominations, although you could call it surprising (or boneheaded) that Christopher Nolan did not get a Directing nomination for Inception. But we probably would have been equally surprised had any of the other nominees been left out. Compared to the DGA Awards (to be handed out this weekend), Nolan was edged by the Coen brothers. But according to the excellent-as-always analysis by Peter Hammond, the Coens will not win the Directing category since they didn’t get an Editing nomination.

After the early part of the awards season saw The Social Network pulling far ahead, the PGA win by The King’s Speech last week seems to have leveled the playing field. The only two Oscars that now seem like a sure thing are Adapted Screenplay for Aaron Sorkin (The Social Network) and Actor in a Supporting Role for Christian Bale (The Fighter).

Sacha Baron Cohen

Luckily, not everyone is busy selling their movies at Sundance or picking up awards. Some are still working to get new projects off the ground. This week, a Hitchcock biopic resurfaced, based on Stephen Rebello’s book about the making of Psycho (24 Frames had the story). And later this week we heard that Anthony Hopkins is in talks to play The Master of Suspense in that project (according to Heat Vision). Sacha Baron Cohen will be making his next film with Paramount Pictures (Deadline announced the deal). It is called The Dictator and is inspired by the novel Zabibah and the King, purportedly written by Saddam Hussein. While that sounds intriguing, it may delay an even more intriguing project: Baron Cohen playing Freddy Mercury. And finally, all the life seems to have been drained out of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. A project that started out in a rush of excitement with (current Oscar nominees) Natalie Portman and David O. Russel attached is now without a star and this week saw its replacement director Mike White depart for a project that will actually get off the ground (Deadline had the story). Time to put that one out of its misery.

Jan 22 2011

The Way Back

For his return to filmmaking after 2003′s Master and Commander, Peter Weir chose a challenging project. The Way Back is inspired by a true-life account of Siberian Gulag escapees walking 4000 miles overland to freedom in India. But since the book by Slawomir Rawicz that first documented this story has been widely contested, Weir chose to do his own research. He claims that every event in the screenplay (that he co-wrote with Keith R. Clarke) can be led back to first-hand accounts, some of which he collected himself by interviewing survivors. The savage environment in which most of the story takes place was shot the old-fashioned way, on location in Morocco, Bulgaria and India. This naturalistic approach to filmmaking yields an end product that “clings bravely to the integrity of its storytelling” (Peter Travers, Rolling Stone), without being very involving. Weir may have gotten the facts right, but he forgot about constructing characters that we can care about.

The movie takes place shortly after the start of World War II and starts out with Polish Janusz (Jim Sturgess) being condemned to a Gulag labor camp in Siberia, where the unforgiving conditions should be enough to deter any attempts at escape. Weir drives the point of the inhuman circumstances home by serving up a series of scenes that show hunger, exhaustion, hard labour, fierce weather conditions and gangs stabbing people at will. I’m sure all these little details are based on Weir’s research but this whole first part of the movie feels very disjointed and in Janusz we still only have one (barely) recognizable character to lead us through it. I’m not giving anything away by telling you that Janusz does escape the camp along with a group of fellow prisoners. Among them are quiet American Mister Smith (Ed Harris) and Russian thug Valka (Colin Farrell). Along the way they pick up a young refugee called Irena (Saoirse Ronan). There are others in the group, but lacking any distinguishing features they are not much more than a backdrop.

The story itself is of course an inspirational tale of survival, and the challenges that our heroes face are intimidating: from sandstorms and blizzards to savage wolfs and killer mosquitoes. But although “the scenes of brute survival (…) are vivid, the men are not” (Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly). What’s more, in between these moments of excitement “is possibly more trudging than you’re going to see in any other film” (Claudia Puig, USA Today). When Saoirse Ronan enters the story as Irena, the screen lights up temporarily because of her engaging performance as the female influence that brings the men closer together. Farrell’s Valka adds a desperately needed comic note here and there, although “it takes time before you can simultaneously see Mr. Farrell and believe in his character” (Manohla Dargis, The New York Times).

Watching The Way Back, you wonder if Weir would have been better off producing a documentary based on this source material. All his resources seem to have been directed at meticulously telling this story, constructed from the facts as he collected them. No time was wasted on building characters or supplying them with a backstory. When Janusz says he has to get back home, we have no idea why. That makes it hard to stay interested for two hours of plodding.

Jan 20 2011

Nolan’s smoke screens and the perils of time travel

Anne Hathaway

So let’s start with the news that’s hot off the press and has the twitterverse in a flutter: Anne Hathaway has been cast as Selina Kyle in Christopher Nolan’s third Batman movie, The Dark Knight Rises (Hero Complex was one of the first to get the story out there). It has certainly been a roller-coaster leading us to this point. First there was the announcement in November that Nolan was meeting with actresses for two roles in the film: a villain and a love interest. Then came a report last week to the same effect, but with some extra info (courtesy of Collider): the villain would be Talia al Ghul and the love interest most likely Vicki Vale. Disappointed fanboys everywhere lamented the exclusion of Catwoman as a villain. Until today, when Warner Bros announced the casting of Anne Hathaway (who had been on the shortlist all along) as Selina Kyle. Period. No mention of Selina’s alter ego Catwoman. So does that make her the love interest or the villain? My theory is that this is one of Nolan’s famous smoke screens. There never were two roles to be cast. The Selina Kyle/Catwoman part folds villain and love interest into one, as we’ve seen before.

The other big movie event this week was of course the Golden Globes ceremony. Ricky Gervais’s ruthless jokes (not to mention the one that was cut) got more attention than the actual award recipients. For what it’s worth, all the award season front-runners were confirmed. It looks like the closest race is coming up in Best Supporting Actress, between Hailee Steinfeld (True Grit) and Melissa Leo (The Fighter). And the HFPA redeemed itself somewhat by not converting any of the three nominations for The Tourist into actual hardware. They even made Paul Giamatti (Barney’s Version) a surprise winner in the category that had Johnny Depp nominated twice.

In terms of new projects, there was news this week regarding Ridley Scott’s Alien prequel. You’ll remember that Damon Lindelof handed in a re-written script in December that Fox was very pleased with. Now Deadline reports that the movie has a name (Prometheus) and has been green-lighted. They’ve even set a worldwide release date already (March 9, 2012). And it’s no longer a prequel. It is now an original story with “strands of Alien‘s DNA”. Noomi Rapace has been cast as one of the leads (the rumors were true) and some big names are apparently circling the other parts (according to Deadline).

Looper production meeting

In other science-fiction news: Joseph Gordon-Levitt tweeted that he is in New Orleans, about to start shooting Looper. That’s the one in which he plays a time-travelling assassin (with a connection to China) who runs into an older version of himself (played by Bruce Willis). Writer-director Rian Johnson is documenting the entire production process for us to follow on Tumblr. Along the same lines, Deadline had the news this week that the remake of the Spanish time-travel mystery Los Cronocrímines has been brought back to life, with Steve Zaillian now rewriting the script for DreamWorks. That movie also has a man running into himself after travelling back in time.

Finally, Sundance is getting underway tomorrow. Besides the films I already mentioned, I have become very curious about I Melt With You (because of Rob Lowe and Jeremy Piven), Vampire (because of its premise), Perfect Sense (because of its trailer) and All Flowers In Time (because it looks like good old-fashioned Lynchean madness). All will be revealed this coming week.

Jan 15 2011

The Green Hornet 3D

The Green Hornet is a movie trying very hard to carve out new territory for itself without being entirely successful. In part it is a post-modern superhero movie in the vein of Kick-Ass, in that it shows our hero wondering what it would be like to be a vigilante, assembling his own home-made costume and going out into the streets knees shaking. It is also a buddy movie in the Rush Hour mold (or to use a more contemporary term: a bromance) where a loud-mouthed jackass is paired with a quiet but capable partner. It doesn’t quite reach the level of either of the aforementioned examples, but the mash-up is still a good ride thanks in large part to Seth Rogen.

Rogen (who also co-wrote with Evan Goldberg) stars as Britt Reid, son of a newspaper mogul who never had much interest in raising a son. Britt now spends his days wasting dad’s money by drinking champagne in stretch limos until Reid senior suddenly passes away. All this is told in opening scenes that are languidly paced and basically superfluous. The movie starts to pick up the pace when Kato (Jay Chou) enters the scene and an enjoyable partnership between him and Britt takes shape, although Chou’s “halting delivery often impedes their patter” (Claudia Puig, USA Today). Kato used to work for Britt’s dad and turns out to be a man of many talents (karate, bulletproof cars, the perfect cappuccino). His skill and modesty is the perfect complement to Britt’s defiance and before you know it The Green Hornet and his as yet nameless sidekick are ridding the streets of crime (with the occasional police car as collateral damage). Of course this does not sit well with L.A.’s biggest mob boss Chudnofsky (Christoph Waltz), who turns out to have a connection to the Reid family. And… oh, yeah… there is also Cameron Diaz as Britt’s secretary, a character so loosely written into the plot that it is hard to see her as anything other than the “object of just enough lust to allay any anxieties that Britt and Kato might not be straight.” (A.O. Scott, The New York Times)

Not that Diaz doesn’t have some enjoyable scenes. Actually, the entire Rogen – Chou – Waltz – Diaz quartet is excellent. Waltz’s villain may look like nothing more than “a riff on his Oscar-winning performance as Nazi Hans Landa” (Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly) but he still projects an amusing mixture of insecurity and menace (I’d hate to think what Nicholas Cage – who was previously attached – would have done to the part). Chou may struggle with his delivery, but this is adequately compensated by his charisma. And Rogen carries the movie as the “underachieving man-child just innocent enough in his playboy self-delusions to be likable.” (A.O. Scott, The New York Times) Unfortunately the superhero format also calls for gunfights and show-downs, which are dealt with here in a paint-by-number way. The most enjoyable action sequence is actually the scene where Britt and Kato have their big fight (an inevitable part of the bromance): “It is shot and staged with an old-school slapstick attention to detail and surprise, showing exactly the kind of care that is missing from the noisier, duller car chases and shootouts.” (A.O. Scott, The New York Times)

Director Michel Gondry uses only a few opportunities to show his visual flair, such as the time when we go into Britt’s mind as he tries to solve the puzzle of his father’s connection to the bad guys. He also creates a nice split-screen sequence that is the best use of 3D in the entire movie. The post-conversion added nothing to the film except make some scenes too dark, distract us with vast, layered interior spaces and of course: raise ticket prices. Gondry seems to have phoned in some of the scenes, judging by the glaring continuity errors that weren’t or couldn’t be corrected in editing. All things considered, it doesn’t look like he was the right man to helm this movie.

If The Green Hornet is to have a future as a franchise, the makers need to choose a much clearer direction. Even though this is an entertaining movie – especially if you’re a Seth Rogen fan – it could have been much more if it wouldn’t try to be everything at once. Luckily, the delightful epilogue sets up a much more promising potential sequel than did the obligatory and over-the-top violent showdown that came before it. I am convinced there is a really good movie hidden somewhere in this material. Let’s see if moviegoers will supply Rogen and company with a second chance to tease it out.

Jan 12 2011

Promising productions and ill-advised suggestions

After the actors, the writers and the producers, the final major guild nominations were announced this week: the Directors Guild of America announced their Feature Film DGA Award nominations. As I mentioned before, they have been the most accurate predictor of Oscar success of all the peer group awards (although there are some differences in the voting process, as the incisive Peter Hammond explains). There were no surprises in the list, even though some people would have liked to see the Coen brothers or Danny Boyle included. But that is indicative of the strong field of contenders this year. Some very deserving individuals will inevitably be left out in the cold come February.

There are two interesting movies gearing up for production that got some attention this week. One is Clint Eastwood’s next feature: J. Edgar, which stars Leonardo DiCaprio as the first director of the FBI, J. Edgar Hoover. The film will also feature Judi Dench (as Hoover’s mother) and Arnie Hammer (as his protégé Clyde Tolson). Reports that Charlize Theron was going to play Hoover’s personal secretary were dispelled by the actress this week (Vulture has the details). The other interesting project that is coming together is Cogan’s Trade, with Brad Pitt as the driving force (producing and starring). It is based on the hard-boiled 1970s crime novel by George V. Higgins about Jackie Cogan, a mob enforcer who has to restore order after a high-stake card game got heisted. The film was scripted and is to be directed by Andrew Dominik and will also star Casey Affleck and Sam Rockwell (with a lot of other names rumored, but not yet confirmed). The book is set in Boston, but the proceedings have apparently been moved to New Orleans for the film, where production will start at the end of February (as usual, Deadline has the most accurate report on this).

Those are the promising projects. There were also some potentially disastrous ideas launched this week. Perhaps the most troubling one was Baz Luhrmann thinking about shooting The Great Gatsby in 3D (he was at a CES panel in Las Vegas and mentioned this to The Hollywood Reporter). I can see how his visual style could make use of the new technology, but I’m not ready for 1920s New York with goggles. Then there was the Deadline report of Robert Pattinson cast as the lead in Cosmopolis, the Cronenberg adaptation of the Don DeLillo novel. This could ruin a brilliant combination of idiosyncratic director and unusual source material, but who knows… perhaps Pattinson will surprise us (at least he’s trying to branch out, unlike fellow Twilight alum Taylor Lautner). Third on the list of bad ideas is the planned remake of Total Recall, which now looks like it will really happen with Colin Farrell starring (who was actually first attached to the aforementioned Cosmopolis) and Len Wiseman directing (Collider spoke to producer Neal Moritz and has the details). I wish they would leave 90s camp classics alone.

Finally, the potentially most explosive idea was tucked away in a W cover story about David Fincher, currently filming The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo. Apparently, the script by Steven Zaillian “departs rather dramatically from the book (…) most notably (…) the ending has been completely changed”. I’m not sure what this means exactly, because there are in fact two resolutions in the book: one involves the mystery that Salander and Blomkvist are solving and the second involves their relationship. Niels Arden Oplev followed the first one faithfully in his adaptation but departed slightly from the book when it came to the second one. I don’t think you can deviate much further from the Salander/Blomkvist storyline than Oplev did, because it serves as a setup for parts 2 and 3. So presumably Zaillian has reworked the denouement of the Vanger mystery. We’ll have to wait until December to find out.

Jan 08 2011

The Time That Remains

The Time That Remains shows that director Elia Suleiman is first and foremost an observer of everyday life. And it is not so much the conversations that interest him, it’s the sights, the sounds and above all, the silences. That approach to portraying reality takes some getting used to, but makes for a unique film.

Suleiman shares his family history with us in this movie, which “has the scope of a historical epic with none of the expected heaviness” (A.O. Scott, The New York Times). Its subtitle is the “chronicle of a present absentee”, a term used for Arab-Israelis who have been refused Israeli citizenship but remain in the country. The director’s father Fuad (played by Saleh Bakri) is the absentee in question and the film starts in 1948 Nazareth, as the Haganah forces are taking over control and Fuad’s family is thrown into disarray. But although the historic events that form the backdrop for this movie could make it a highly charged and political work, that is not how Suleiman approaches the story. He stays as close as he can to his family history (based on a journal that he asked his father to keep when he fell ill) and manages to make a film that is not about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, but about circumstances beyond our control that determine the course of our lives.

After the opening chapter has set the scene for the Suleiman family – Fuad’s parents and sister Nadia flee to Jordan while he stays behind in Nazareth, unwilling to accept the Israeli rule – we fast forward to 1970 and later 1980. We see a surprisingly normal household in Nazareth consisting of 10-year-old Elia, his father Fuad and his mother. They seem to have accepted their limited freedom of movement and the occasional visit by the security forces. A different life shines through in aunt Nadia’s letters from abroad and political turmoil enters their living room through the TV. Despite the relative normality of their lives, despair is never far away. It can take the form of a neighbor who keeps threatening to set himself on fire in one of the “mordant comic vignettes” (A.O. Scott, The New York Times) that characterize Suleiman’s storytelling style. The film concludes with a chapter set in the present in which E S (played by the director) pays a visit to Ramallah and finally returns to his childhood home in Nazareth and to his dying mother.

A prominent feature of Suleiman’s visual style are the tableaus that he presents to us: as the camera stays still and with limited editing, we are allowed to focus on a meticulous composition of idyllic settings and people taking their positions with carefully choreographed movements. Suleiman also repeats or echoes some of the scenes, allowing us to reflect on their significance. The use of (mostly Arab) music is prominent throughout the movie and helps tell the story. The music also references other films, from the Morricone score that someone whistles to a karaoke version of the Titanic theme song.

The Time That Remains progresses from a first chapter which “is more or less a war movie” (A.O. Scott, The New York Times) through a tranquil study of family life in extraordinary circumstances to a final act that is a somewhat protracted observation (quite literally) by the director of his mother in present-day Nazareth. In this final chapter, the film loses some of its impact. Perhaps because his father’s source material has run out, it becomes too much of an ego document to be interesting to all viewers. But the movie regains its message in the final scene, which invites the viewer to ponder human resilience vis-à-vis the forces of history.

Jan 06 2011

The Real King of Hollywood

The WGA and PGA Award nominations were announced this week. The Writers Guild list included two surprises: Please Give for Original Screenplay and I Love You Phillip Morris for Adapted Screenplay. But this is mostly due to the strict eligibility guidelines of the WGA (which disqualified screenplays such as The King’s Speech), so don’t expect to see these two again on January 25, when the Oscar nominations are announced. The Producers Guild nominations had no surprises. Most people agree that these will also be the ten titles nominated for the Best Picture Academy Award. The only point of contention is whether The Town will make it there or perhaps be replaced by Winter’s Bone.

Scott Rudin (center) with the Coen brothers after their Best Picture win at the 2008 Oscars

An interesting fact about the PGA nominations is that producer Scott Rudin is nominated for two films: True Grit and The Social Network. It is the first time this has happened and the feat will likely be repeated for the Academy Awards. In addition, Rudin will be honored with a David O. Selznick Achievement Award by the PGA. He is currently on top of his game, consistently picking winners and getting films that look difficult on paper out to broad audiences without dumbing them down. Although Rudin tends to be modest about it, his influence on the final product should not be underestimated. Deadline’s Mike Fleming had an extensive interview with Rudin this week in which he gives some insight into the way he collaborates with headstrong directors like Fincher and the Coens. And it doesn’t look like his streak is about to come to an end. Some of the projects he has lined up are The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (currently shooting) and Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (about to start shooting with Tom Hanks and Sandra Bullock).

In the Deadline interview, Rudin also talks about one of the most ambitious projects (and certainly the most expensive) he is working on: Cleopatra. If you recall, this was talked about in October with Angelina Jolie starring and James Cameron directing. But then Cameron dropped out to do Avatar 2 and 3. I had thought that was the end of it, but Jolie is still attached and Rudin is now apparently looking for a new director (Deadline has heard some rumors). The movie is based on the biography by Stacy Schiff and as such seems to become a puzzling self-contradiction: trying to get past the glamorous image of Cleopatra the seductress in a 3D Hollywood movie starring Angelina Jolie. But if there’s anyone who can pull it off, it’s Rudin.

Jan 01 2011

Peer Pressure

As you can imagine, the last two weeks of the year are decidedly slow when it comes to movie news. However, I was able to save up a morsel here and there for this first post of the year. 2010 was a disappointing year in terms of movie attendance, which was down more than 5% compared to 2009. However, total revenue was close to last year’s because of higher 3D ticket prices. Hollywood.com has the figures and predicts things to pick up again for 2011 and 2012 with some very big releases on the horizon.

Probably the biggest movie-related news of the past two weeks involved Natalie Portman’s personal life. That also means we’re not going to talk about it here (been living under a rock?) except to say that the announcement coincided with the release of the trailer for one of Portman’s upcoming movies: The Other Woman (previously released in some European countries as Love and Other Impossible Pursuits). There are striking, slightly unsettling parallels between this plot and some of the details of her personal life. See for yourself.

Despite the lull of the past few weeks we remain in the middle of awards season, and indieWIRE is still keeping track for us of all the awards being announced in the build-up to the Oscars. In recent weeks, we’ve seen Colin Firth (The King’s Speech) and Natalie Portman (Black Swan) pulling ahead for Best Actor and Actress as well as Christian Bale (The Fighter) for Best Supporting Actor. But you have to keep in mind that most of the awards being tallied are handed out by critics associations. More interesting as an indicator for the Oscars are the awards determined by peer groups, because that is how voting for the Academy Awards also takes place. There are four major peer groups handing out awards before the Oscars: the Screen Actors Guild (SAG), the Writers Guild of America (WGA), the Directors Guild of America (DGA) and the Producers Guild of America (PGA).

Justin Timberlake and Kate Hudson at last year's SAG Awards

Of these, the SAG Awards are the most high-profile, with a full-scale red carpet event on January 30. SAG Awards nominations held no big surprises. Then there’s the WGA, which distinguishes itself by having very strict guidelines for eligibility of scripts (the films have to be made under WGA jurisdiction). This means that awards front-runners like The King’s Speech, Blue Valentine and Another Year are not eligible. The result is a disconnect with the Oscars, which Deadline’s Pete Hammond laments. WGA Award nominations will be announced this coming Tuesday and the awards are handed out on February 5. Nominations for the PGA Awards are also announced on Tuesday (to be handed out January 22). PGA could be said to predict the Best Picture Oscar winner but keep in mind that all Academy members are eligible to select nominees for this category, not just the producers. And finally, the DGA (Feature Film) Award is probably the most accurate barometer of the bunch (the winner went on to win the Best Director Oscar  56 out of 62 times). Nominations are announced on January 10, the awards are handed out on January 29. So we have a very busy and interesting month of awards ahead of us.

Finally, following the success and exposure of the annual Black List (for unproduced screenplays), there is now a similar list of shorts, commercials and music videos called Viewfinder, which is meant to bring aspiring filmmakers to our attention. Like the Black List, it is based on a poll of industry professionals. All the works mentioned can be viewed on the site (my personal favorite is embedded above), and some of them have already been acquired for feature film adaptation (such as Pixels and The Raven). The list can be an entertaining way to spend a few hours, getting to know some up-and-coming talent. Beats reading through a stack of screenplays.

Dec 30 2010

Another Year

Mike Leigh’s Another Year is a quiet, unassuming movie that unnoticeably gets under your skin. In Leigh’s familiar style, nothing much happens on the screen except people interacting. It is through their interactions that we get to know a small group of characters. And it is through getting to know them that observations about life start to surface, during or maybe several days after seeing the film: “the casual details, nuanced performances and clever dialogue are hard to shake from memory” (Claudia Puig, USA Today). If this slow-food approach to cinema is not your taste, it is best to stay away. But if you’re thirsting for a break from thumping basses, deafening explosions and roller-coaster plots, this can be a very rewarding movie-going experience.

Another Year introduces us to Gerri (Ruth Sheen) and Tom (Jim Broadbent, “masterfully subtle” [Claudia Puig, USA Today]), an older married couple who seem to have found the key to happiness. They live in a quiet part of London, where Tom works as a geologist for government projects and Gerri is a counselor at a clinic. Their free time is spent in their vegetable garden from which they bring back fresh tomatoes for Tom’s signature dishes. The film quite cleverly opens from the opposite perspective: a dour, depressed housewife (Imelda Staunton) who ends up in a counseling session with Gerri. This scene introduces an important theme: If we are leading a life of fulfillment, do we have a responsibility to help people who are not so adept at living? Is it even possible to offer such help?

After this prologue, the perspective shifts to Tom and Gerri (yes, they’ve heard that one before) and we spend most of the movie in their house as they receive friends and family for dinner and drinks. The tragicomic centre of the story is Mary (Lesley Manville), Gerri’s friend from work whose chattiness and hyperactivity almost manage to brush away her deep self-doubt. In her fifties, she professes to be satisfied with her single life after several failed relationships. But as the seasons progress and cinematographer Dick Pope‘s palette becomes colder and harsher, Mary’s front slowly crumbles. Even though Tom and especially Gerri are very patient with her through alcohol-fused evenings, Mary manages to cross a line with this family. I will not give away this central dramatic turn, except to say that it involves Gerri and Tom’s son Joe (Oliver Maltman). Joe works as a community lawyer, starts out as “a bit of a dark horse” (as Gerri says at one point) but surprises us by finding his way in the course of this year.

Almost all of the exposition in Another Year is done through dialogue, so we spend a lot of time watching these characters talk and react in silence to things that are being said. None of what is said evokes particularly strong images, so that somewhat dampens the experience of viewing this movie. But it is all instrumental in getting to know these individuals “deeper (…) than one would have thought possible” (Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times). We briefly see Mary’s place of work (as well as Joe’s) but we don’t see where they live. We experience them solely in the context of their visits to Gerri and Tom. A clever narrative tool, which sharpens the contrast between a satisfied couple who cherish what they have and the friends surrounding them, who either resign themselves to the darkness that old age can bring or refuse to face the fact that they have missed a few exits in life.

Quite subtly, this film also has something to say about the city versus the country. The former has offered Tom the opportunity to escape the dreary existence of his native Derby, that we briefly return to for the final chapter. But those same opportunities can also become a trap if you’re unable to make the right choices, as is the case with Mary. Modern life is not laid out for you. You have to design your own way forward. And not everyone has that skill.

Older posts «